Writing Down the Jones

Archive for the ‘Words’ Category

Why do I keep reading this?

Aoccdrnig To A Rscheearch At Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, It Deosn’t Mttaer In Waht Oredr The Ltteers In A Wrod Are, The Olny Iprmoatnt Tihng Is Taht The Frist And Lsat Ltteer Be In The Rghit Pclae. The Rset Can Be A Taotl Mses And You Can Sitll Raed It Wouthit A Porbelm. Tihs Is Bcuseae The Huamn Mnid Deos Not Raed Ervey Lteter By Istlef, But The Wrod As A Wlohe.

I’ve seen this, or something similar at least 50 times, the first being about 5 years ago at a youth ministry conference (that was the day I learned about Moralistic Therapeutic Deism – useless info, I know). For some reason I read it all the way through every time. What’s wrong with me?

Two Sad Realizations

I just coded a page where you can see my reading year-by-year, which can be found here. After I was finished, admiring my coding work, I noticed two things that made me a little sad.

  1. Last year I read 36 books, a number that I’m really proud of. But I was only able to get up 20 reviews. Then I threw a pity party, posted about it, and said I’d write more. Yeah, that didn’t happen.
  2. It is June 21st, and I’ve only finished 7 books this year. So, I’m reducing my goal to 26, and hoping for the best. Wish me luck!

Straight White Men Against the World

A four-word anthem played on Twitter the other day, and I fell silent in awe: “SOCIAL MEDIA IS DISCO.”

The author was Emily Nussbaum, a cultural critic I’ve admired for a long time. She was answering a question I’d raised about why women, gay people and nonwhite people revel in the very forms of Internet culture that make some of the prominent straight white men who write about the Internet most dejected, fearful and furious. Those forms include message boards, online video, social networking, online publishing, various mobile apps and chat technology — all the digital stuff I happen to find more or less miraculous.

~Virginia Heffernan – NYT

This article is just strange. As a college-educated, uptown-living, straight black man in his 20′s (for a few more months, anyway), who is also a tech-sector guy, this just doesn’t make sense. First, almost every man I know is straight and white. And almost every one of them posts to Twitter and Facebook at least ten times daily, and most have a Tumblr, a Posterous, and a blog that they are posting to at least daily.

In contrast, among the nonwhites and women that I know (I don’t run into a lot of GLBT folk, since I’m at the seminary almost all the time), while all use their Facebook on most days, only one has a Twitter feed, and – other than the ubiquitous mommy-blogs – none have a blog of any sort that’s maintained with any regularity.

So what’s going on here? Am I living in a pocket of the Twilight Zone that snuck into my little urban area? Am I just not paying close enough attention? And why does Heffernan seem to go to such great lengths to make this distinction between the SWM (that’s straight white male) and everyone else? Why does she try to make it empowering to lump all of us “others” into one group? Read more

Math or English?

I’ve started alternative teacher certification this spring, and in Texas (I suspect this is true most places, as well) high school math teachers are in high demand. I’ve always liked math, and I don’t want to risk not getting a teaching job this fall after all of the work this will take, so I’m signed up to take the subject test to be “highly qualified” to teach math for grades 8-12.

This test is hard.

I never had trouble with math, and I did well on the SAT (a decade ago) and the GRE (a year ago). But this test is likely to include upper level trig and differential calculus. This is not my, as they say, “forte” – not anymore. At ACU only the science and math majors were allowed to take legitimate math classes, so I was removed from the calculus class I’d registered for and put in a class that might as well have been taught from an Algebra for Dummies book. So it’s been more than ten years since I took calculus, which makes me a bit rusty.

I’ve been working through a college-level pre-calculus book, and the calculus equations aren’t intimidating anymore, but the task is still daunting. And then, once I’ve taken (and passed, I hope) the test, I’ll be teaching this math to others.

Granted, the concepts will flow more easily after a few months of work, and I’ll probably start out teaching algebra and geometry, which are not at all complex. I can even see myself studying (applied) math at the master’s level and enjoying it.

But there’s something about teaching English that keeps pulling at my intellectual heartstrings. That something is the readings I’ve done over the past few years from E.D. Hirsch, Neil Postman, Alfred North Whitehead (a math teacher, incidentally), and Stanley Fish. Language is the foundation for all of our thought and learning. The more we command our language, the more we command our thought; as we become clearer thinkers, we become better communicators; and as we become better communicators, we – and everyone around us – become better learners.

That’s a powerful idea, one that far outstrips the (admittedly high) ideal of exposing students to the best thinking and writing of the Western Tradition. It’s more compelling than the image of quality speaking and writing as a necessity to economic or social advancement. And it has more potential to raise achievement at all levels and in any subject where verbal communication is necessary (that would be all of them).

And on top of all that, I would get to teach Beowulf, and have students do artistic renderings of Grendel’s dismemberment. That idea just makes me smile.

Bailed, but Now I’m Back

I totally ditched 2010. It’s fitting that my last post was in September, and titled “Abandoned.” Prescient, even. Certainly not intentional.

I didn’t abandon the 52 books project completely. I reached 31 by the end of the year. Not too bad, considering I don’t think I’d read 30 books in the 10 previous years. I also picked up some new hobbies. Sketching and comic books in particular. I’m a new man for 2011, and I’ve already finished my first book, Stephen Gould’s Jumper, and started the second, Neil Postman’s Teaching as a Conserving Activity.

I may or may not write more than a blurb about the first, it’s been weeks since I finished it. But I’m very excited about this Postman work. It is, in his own words, his “vice versa” to Teaching as a Subversive Activity (which I definitely didn’t like).

I’m sure the list this year will include some graphic novels and comics, when I need to get them in. Probably not a lot, though.

Not much else to tell, really. Actually, there’s plenty; I’m just not telling. Shalom.